When I first read Martin Fowler’s Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code, I stumbled on the phrase “That which can’t be tested doesn’t exist.”
In the years that followed, it has been something of a mantra to me, though I’ve found many things that made testing simply impractical.
What I want to do in this post is flip my earlier quote ON ITS HEAD!
Here’s a new category for ya!
In the category of not-really-a-corollary-but-it-makes-your-head-spin-to-think-of-it (dare me to add THAT to my blog categories!), Martin Weigel wrote in Restating The Wearingly Obvious, “You can’t test what doesn’t exist.”
That is flippin’ AWESOME! What he calls “wearingly obvious”, he describes in much more detail to be somewhat of a side effect of common sense thinking that we have ignored (in his case in the advertising industry) for over 30 years!
Here are a couple of key quotes and ideas from his writing that I see as relevant to the software industry:
- The idea that we can test “rough ideas” allows people to “abdicate their personal judgement and taste”, in other words, to “pass the buck” – what happens to the agile project without Metaphor or increasingly refined requirements?
- “Until you actually have finished work you are not testing creative solutions” – Hmm… sounds familiar (but not the same)?
- “Incomplete ideas evoke rough, incomplete responses from people” – even though he is writing about advertising, isn’t it important that what we test in agile is “true”, and that the reliability of our tests is related to some notion of completeness in the scenarios we anticipate?
- “Any research is therefore as authoritative and as fallible as the individual judgements and opinions of those involved in the [advertising] process.” Amen to that!
Software development is creative work
And then he ends with a couple of really great sentences:
“There is no methodology in the world that can remove the element of uncertainty from the development of creative work. However much some might wish that to be the case.
“All creative decisions ultimately involve a leap of faith. And that requires more than simple courage. It requires people with taste and vision. People with the imagination and sensitivity to think ahead and be able to picture what has not yet been created.
“If you are unable to grasp these simple truths, if you slavishly believe rough responses to rough work to be The Truth, and treat them as directives for creative development, if you are uncomfortable with the notion of taking a leap of faith… then you are not one of those people. And you are very probably in fact, in the way.”
Wow! I hated quoting so much of his material here, but my challenge is that you look beyond the advertising domain he is writing about and think about the implications to software development.
So how does this trigger you? Let me know with a comment.